Founder
Dr. Mehmet Tank
Dr. Mehmet Tank is a Swiss-based arbitration practitioner with a distinguished judicial background and over two decades of experience in high-stakes litigation and dispute resolution.
As the founder of MT Arbitration & Dispute Resolution, he uniquely integrates his expertise as a former judge in Turkey, a legal scholar (PhD), and a graduate of the Swiss Arbitration Academy. This multifaceted perspective allows him to provide strategic, principled, and highly effective representation in complex international commercial disputes.
To discuss how we can assist with your legal matters, please contact us.
PRACTICE AREAS
- International Arbitration & Mediation (ADR)
- ICC & Swiss Arbitration
- Turkish Law Expertise
- Litigation Strategy & Case Analysis
- Administrative, Tax & Custom Disputes
- Turkish Public Procurement Law
- Regulatory Compliance
- Cross-Border Disputes & M&A Support
- Evidence Law & Procedural Strategy
- Strategic Partnerships & Solutions
-
Global Conflict Resolution
(EU, USA, MENA, Africa & Asia)
LEGAL COUNSEL
Dr. Mehmet Tank
Arb.P & CAS, (Swiss Arbitration Academy)
With over 24 years of experience in dispute resolution, Dr. Mehmet Tank provides high-level expertise in international arbitration, strategic legal analysis, and alternative dispute resolution (ADR).
He holds the prestigious Arb.P and CAS designations from the Swiss Arbitration Academy (in cooperation with the Universities of Neuchâtel and Lucerne). His practice is defined by a rigorous commitment to legal integrity, informed by more than two decades of experience as a former tax judge and legal counsel in complex commercial disputes.
As a legal scholar with a PhD in Public Law specializing in evidence law, Dr. Tank offers a sophisticated and objective perspective on issues of proof—a critical requirement for serving as an independent expert or arbitrator in high-stakes cross-border proceedings.
Combined with his deep-rooted expertise in Turkish Law, this multifaceted background enables him to provide authoritative and impartial counsel. His dual-jurisdiction insight is particularly valued in institutional and ad hoc arbitrations where procedural depth and substantive accuracy are paramount.